I love your column It's so refreshing to get a...
I love your column. It's so refreshing to get a straight answer in language I can understand. I have a 1986 Buick Regal with 185,000 miles on it. About two and a half years ago, it started burning oil. I took it to the dealer, who said the return holes in my cylinder heads were plugged up. So they unplugged them (I guess) and replaced the gaskets for $150. About six months later, I saw oil leaking where the gasket had been replaced. I was afraid to go back to the dealer since it had been six months, and I was afraid they might come up with another reason it was losing oil and charge me more money. Now, I have to add a quart every 100 miles, and the mechanic tells me I need a new engine. Should I spend 2,000-3,000 dollars to do the repairs, or should I just buy a new car?
I am a single, 55 year old female, and I need to hear from you as soon as possible.
TOM: I beg your pardon, Betty! What do you think this is, the personal ads? This is the automotive column!
RAY: Actually, the question of whether to dump an old car gets very complicated, Betty. You have to factor in the age, the mileage, the condition of the rest of the car, how long these cars typically last, your financial situation, and, of course, any significant or memorable events that took place in the car. You get the picture.
TOM: But in your case, I'd forget all that stuff and just dump this beast. The 1986 Regal was not a wonderful car to begin with. And by any measure, you got at least 85,000 miles more than you should have gotten out of it.
RAY: I agree. With 185,000 miles, you're so far off the curve, they'd have to add another page to include you. Given how long these cars tend to last, putting an engine in this car is not a good long term strategy.
TOM: And you have to think long term, Betty. Any single, 55 year old woman who tries to get a date with TWO auto mechanics right here in the newspaper obviously has a lot of life left in her! Good luck, Betty.